Published
In this lecture, Prof. Ian Shapiro provides an international law background on non-intervention; discusses what the ICC and R2P are, and how radical they were for a refashioning of the legal and political order; as well as goes over the roles played by interest, institutions and ideas in the establishment of the ICC and R2P.
- Category
- Academic
Sign in or sign up to post comments.
Be the first to comment
Up Next
Autoplay
-
01:59
Closing of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia
-
08:04
António Guterres (UN Secretary-General) on the Responsibility to Protect
-
21:29
"If You Have the ABILITY, Then You Have the RESPONSIBILITY!" | #Becoming
-
00:22
Taking Responsibility
-
04:38
Can You Handle The Responsibility Of Success?
-
18:45
The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) & other topics - Daily Briefing (25 June 2018)
-
01:10
COVID-19 Response: Protect our community. Protect the vulnerable. Protect yourself.
-
01:43
Inaugural Session of the International Court of Justice
-
00:08
Kitty Criminal Goes Paws Up!
-
00:48
Dalveer Bhandari from India was elected today to the International Court of Justice (ICJ)
-
16:09
I didn't know my boyfriend was a criminal… help.
-
00:41
Responsible: Response Able | Whatever happens, take responsibility. ????
-
40:17
International Business - Lecture 02
-
01:26
Syria must be referred to the International Criminal Court, says UN rights chief
-
18:49
What is the International Court of Justice? The Role and Activities of the ICJ
-
00:35
The UN International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda metes out justice
-
13:04
"Take RESPONSIBILITY for Your Own HAPPINESS!" | Will Smith
-
04:06
20 Years Challenging Impunity - United Nations International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda
-
02:00
‘Not Only Do They Have The Right To Take Your Child, They Have The Responsibility To Take Your Ch…
-
00:20
Success and Responsibility
-
01:02
Acquittal of former president Gbagbo of war crimes in Côte d’Ivoire - International Criminal Court
-
50:13
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) delivers its Order in the case of Iran v. USA
